CRESCENT;

[cyclists]

Crescent

As The Crescent:
Every Monday, the Crescent will meet with the Signs and be given the opportunity to grant one other player immunity for the week. This immunity will allow the player to live for that week even if they are chosen as a victim by the Corrupted.

Should the Crescent choose to protect someone and that person is selected as a victim, however, the Crescent's name will be provided as the victim and they will die in that week to protect the chosen player.

The Crescent will also be allowed to submit a name for a victim in order to protect someone else. If they are concerned that someone they wish to protect will be chosen by the Corrupted, they may enact a trade to sacrifice another player. While there is no guarantee that the name they've offered will be chosen, this action will earn favor among the Signs.

The choice must be made at the time of the meeting. The Crescent only gets one meeting per week and they must choose wisely if they wish to protect someone and risk their own life, or offer someone as a failsafe sacrifice. (i.e. "I would like to protect X" versus "should X be chosen by the Corrupted, I would like to substitute Y.")

When the Signs seek to summon the Crescent, a portal will appear when they finds themselves alone. Upon entering the portal, they will be brought into a tea room where the Signs are waiting for them. When their visit in the room concludes and they choose to exit, the portal will disappear. The Crescent will find that no matter how long they spent in the tea Room, no time has elapsed outside of the portal.

Additional notes:
The Crescent will be allowed to ask questions about the ongoings of the game and communicate with the Signs in their weekly meetings. They will be able to also receive small hints in the game should they perform well, including game mechanics, locations and more. However, the information received will be up to the Signs' discretion.

Best of luck.

main navigation.

locations ✧ powers ✧ profiles
private conversations ✧ audiences ✧ faq

Comments

[tothemaxwell]

A good question, as usual, Sol.

The answer is that we must live by example to others. We cannot force their hands—so we must show them how it is done, and protect them wherever possible. We help by living, fighting for, and desiring that safe world.

Progress does not happen overnight, however—and therein lies the flaw in the scheme. Unless you are immortal, then one day, you will die, and your ideals and goals will be muddled, potentially forgotten by the next generation. It cannot simply be one person. Therefor, rather than forcing this change, we must develop it into a culture, stretching outwards, and build that into people's beliefs.

Essentially, that is what we must try and do here, on a smaller level.

[cyclists]

[Wow. Milla actually got what the fuck Sol's been trying to say to everybody from the beginning and failed to do because he's not great at explaining.]

That's essentially how the core is going to be shaped. By the example set by you guys, so if there are people here that set a good example and allow others to follow them, we can continue banishing the unrest or whatever and stabilize the universe, and the worlds connected.

It's been several weeks since you guys got here. Do you think that people have made progress and found others to follow?

[tothemaxwell]

Then... the core is more akin to an infant than anything else, isn't it? A child that must be raised correctly by its parents.

Hmm... progress? I think so. Yes, I feel people are slowly forming groups, and growing to respect each other, in one way or another.

[despite the, you know. murders.]

[cyclists]

Yes. That's exactly it. It's replacing the old one, but it's still very young and requires guidance. That's why it needs something to follow. [He hums in agreement to that though.] But the groups are still separate from each other, aren't they? How do we get everybody on the same page?

[tothemaxwell]

Mutual bonding, trust building, and time. Nothing will happen overnight—and people must be, in their own way, open to the opportunity.

Therein, I believe, lies the problem. Many are still closed to sharing their lives and minds.

[cyclists]

So I've noticed. You can't really force bonding activities on people but it'd make it easier. Maybe make it into a game or something. If people don't feel like they're being forced, they might comply with that idea.

[tothemaxwell]

No, not at all. That is not generally how true trust is built.

[...]

Usually, it helps if all have one sole cause to unite against. At the moment, the corruption is present, but formless, and in everyone's hearts. In that way, it is hard to distinguish the corruption from the people themselves. What makes the choice to kill a corrupted friend better than an uncorrupted friend? The mixed morality of it severs the group dynamic, and forces people into hiding.

Perhaps, if the corruption took on its own form... if we could force it out, in such a way...

[cyclists]

But if it doesn't...then we're faced with the same problem. So there has to be another way to make people realize morality can't always be what drives us. It's something I have to remind myself sometimes, too, but I get it's harder for others.

[tothemaxwell]

Morality... hmm.

It's a human concept. A determination to distinguish what is "right" from what is "wrong".

Rather than morality, or a fight against "evil"... the next best thing would be establishing a shared goal of best intent. We work together, animus aside, or at least temporarily abandoned, to do what is best for someone other than ourselves.

[cyclists]

So. Kind of like sacrifice then. If everyone's working together and willing to sacrifice themselves...you sure there'll be people left? [He's trying here.]

[tothemaxwell]

Ha ha ha. It would be the equivalent of everyone offering everyone else the last slice of cake on a plate, wouldn't it?

I do not think any form of sacrifice is easy, or clean. Whatever end we arrive at, it will not be without a number of troubling sacrifices.

Now I turn the question on you, Sol. You must have thought about this at some length, and talked with many others—are you favoring any path in particular?

[cyclists]

Of course I've thought about it, even if there isn't much we can do ourselves to get there. [Hm...] I just want a path where the the core will provide the answers for those who're looking for them. A path of light will help more than a path of darkness, but...at the same time, I don't want people to be entirely afraid of the darkness either. Does that make sense?

[tothemaxwell]

It does, completely. Balance must be maintained. Those too greedy for the light are the equal of those consumed by darkness.

In simpler words, all light casts a shadow.

[cyclists]

Exactly. Sometimes people get too focused on their goals to reach the greater good that they hurt more people and worlds that way. I don't want that to happen. If a balance can be maintained, it's probably better.